The Hypocrisy of the Speed Limit

The following was a paper I wrote for English Class.

I got a 91/100. Since this paper, the national speed limit was repealed.

January, 17, 1994.


The Speed limit involves a gruesomely cynical quest for bucks from the motoring public. Sadly, all members of the claque of anti-speeders wrap themselves in the flag, claiming to serve as protectors of the public who root out sociopathic speeders in their midst. The lot of them-the cops, the safety gang, the lawyers, the insurance moguls, the gadget-builders-are in the game for one thing: pure old hard-dollar profit.” (Car & Driver, Jully, 1992. P.16)


The national speed limit is a tool based on unjust reasons used by the Government to benefit themselves and others.The Government originally invented the national speed limit to save fuel, but it was never proven to save fuel nationally. The speed limit has not been proven to save lives but we are led to believe it does. The speed limit has not been determined to be the safest speed. The Government wants us to speed and bring them and others money.

In 1974, under the Emergency Conservation Act of 1974, the Department of Transportation set the national speed limit during the energy crisis to save fuel. “Quick studies were done to figure energy saving potential of speeds of 40, 50, 55, and 50 mile an hour. Going for the middle of the range, the original proposal called for 50 mph” (Pisarski 15), but the speed of 55 mph was eventually decided on.

But 55 mph was never proven to cause a decrease in the use of fuel nationally, but even if it did, fuel does not need to be conserved.


The Department of Transportation originally estimated the potential fuel savings from this law at about 200,000 barrels of oil per day. Subsequent studies on the energy-saving effects of 55 have been inconclusive, largely because it is difficult to seperate out other causes of reduced gasoline usage, such as reduced travel and a shift to smaller, better-milage cars.” (Pisarski 15)

But this does not matter since the gas shortage is over and gas is abundant and gas prices seem to be dropping.

Regardless of the fact that the speed limit has not been proved to saved fuel nationally, the Government and others still claim that it does. The National Safety Council said in a 1984 study “that a higher limit would burn up 167,000 more barrels of oil daily.” (U.S News & World Report, October 6, 1986, p.18) Even some 55 mph road signs say “Conserve fuel.”

When the gas shortage was over, the Government changed from saying the speed limit saves fuel and kept the 55 mph speed limit by claiming it saved lives. That speed limit was never proven to be the specific cause of the reduction of fatalities. “In the early days of the law, highway fatalities did decline, though it’s hard to tell just how much of the reduction can be attributed to the new speed limit.” (Pisarski 15) This is because the death rate has steadily declined for over 50 yeras. The rate of deaths on the highway has dropped from “4.1 per 100 million miles traveled in 1973, to 1.8 this year” (Car & Driuver, April, 1993. p.21), a record low. Yet the average speed people travel continues to rise.

Even though the speed limit has not been proven to save lives, there is a belief that the national speed limit does save lives. When a person is pulled over for exceeding the speed limit, it is said they are being a hazardous driver by the Government and some citizens. There are those people that probably everyone has seen who drive exactly the speedn limit. They insist on driving exactly the speed limit even when everyone around them is traveling 15 to 20 mile faster than them. They probably believe they are doing their part by being a safe driver and that they are saving lives.

People believe this because they are led to. In the United States, it is thought by many, that the speed limits are associated with safety. Why do people believe the speed limit is there for their safety? Because it is the law. The speed limit is a law, so it must exist because it helps people. The speed limit must be there for safety reasons.

The Government and safety organizations “(and their primary sponsors, the trial lawyers and insurance industry)” (Car & Driver, Jully, 1992. P.16) help spread this belief. One thing supporters of the 55 mph speed limit claim is that the highway slowdown to 55mph “has saved as many as 4,00 lives a year since it took effect in 1974.” (Maclean’s 66) The Government and safety organizations use unproven statistics like these and other methods like safety programs to help persuade the public to believe the national speed limit exists for safety reasons.

The speed limit does not exist for safety reasons. Today, on some roads, the speed limit is 65. If a car hit another car there would be more damage at 65 mph than at 35 mph. If everyone drove 10 mph there would be much less fatalities. So clearly 65 or 55 is not the safest speed. But everyone would not enjoy traveling so slow and large amounts of time would be wasted driving. So there must be an ideal speed that reduces the amount of deaths while providing smooth efficient travel (Pisarski 15) The national speed limit was never determined to be that ideal speed.

If 55 mph pulled out of a hat in 1974, is the correct speed, it would be a miracle. Perhaps the optimal speed is 63.5 or 47 or even 75. But the transportation bureaucrats don’t know and never have tried to find out what that point is. Such a calcuation would be exceedingly difficult, as well as very expensive. (Pisarski 15,16)

If the speed limit is not the optimal speed, doesn’t exist to save lives or fuel nationally it must exist because the majority of Americians accept it and obey it. But this is not true. The majority of Americans violate the speed limit. Prevention Magazine conducted a survey in 1992 and just 48 percent of responders said they obey the speed limits. (Car & Driver, Sept, 1993, p.25) Newsweek said in 1986:

In California, 47 percent of the drivers favor keeping the (55) limit. But support drops dramtically if it is stipulated that tickets would be given for speeds below 62 mph, and 74 percent admit to speeding occasionally. By actual measurement, 75 percent of vehicles on monitored stretches of rural interstate highways were exceeding the speed limit last year.” (1985)(Newsweek 15)

“In June, 1996, A gallup Poll found 66 percent of Americans support the 55 limit while other surveys indicate as many as 85 percent of motorists regularly violate the law.” (U.S. News & World Report 8) Senator Steven Symms (R-Idaho) once said in the 80’s “no law in this country causes more cynicism.” (U.S. News & World Report 8)

Since the speed limit is kept even though the majority of people violate the law and it does not do the things the government and others claim, then the speed limit must benefit someone. The speed limit benefits the Government and business. Because the speed limit benefits them, they do not want it to be raised. The Government and businesses would probably lower the speed limit back to 55 or lower if they could because they know the lower the speed limit, the more people speed.


If the Federal State and Local Governments really wanted everyone to obey the speed limit, vehicles sold in this country would be legally required to have a governor that would limit speed to 65 mph and tampering with one would be a federal offense.” (Eagan 5)

The real reason the Government and businesses support the national speed limit is because it generates revenue. James Eagan was a New York Cop for 20 years. Through his experience and being on the inside, he has printed the Government’s view of the speed limit and why it exists in these words:

The only logicial conclusion that can be drawn is that the members of the hierarchy do not want you to slow down but, despite their public service announcements to the contrary, they want you to speed so you can get a ticket. Lastly, the reason for this preference is obvious. Speeding tickets are big business. They permit and justify the employment of an army of civil servants including police, their supervisors, court clerks, accountants, judges,.. and more. At the same time, tickets provide the necessary revenue to pay all those gainfully employed voters. If the volume of issued tickets begins to drop, the whole system begins to crumble like a city in an earthquake.. If everyone stopped speeding tomorrow, our taxes would skyrocket and massive unemployment would begin. If our elected officials were honest they would tell you that you owe it to your country to speed.” (Eagan 5,6).

So the speed limit does not save fuel nationally, it has not been proven to save lives, and does not exist for our safety. The speed limit does exist just to provide revenue to the Government and business.


Works Cited
“Apres Moi, les midgets.” Car & Driver July, 1992: 16.

“Arkansas Savior.” Car & Driver Apr, 1993: 21.

Eagan, James M. A speeder’s Guide to Avoiding Tickets. New York: Avon Books, 1990: 5-6.

“For your infomation.” Car & Driver. Sept, 1992: 25.

“Is the AAA on our side again?” Car & Driver. May, 1993: 25.

“Passing up the ‘double nickel’.” U.S. News & World Report. 6 Oct, 1986: 8.

Pisarski, Alan E. “Deep-six 55.” Consumer Reasearch Magazine Dec 1986: 15-18.

“Pusing the Speed limit.” Maclean’s Oct, 1986: 66.

“Senate Bill aims to put brakes on high-risk drivers.” Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 5 June, 1993: 1417.

More Comments
If speeding were wrong then why do they keep changing speed limits on the same road? On one road the speed limit was 50, then 45, then 35, then finally 25. What are they smoking? Could you now say it was wrong to go over 25 when it was 50 before? I don’t think so.

What about states like Montana? They had no speed limit for a while. What’s different there than say here in California? They have governments there that aren’t out to steal all our money by speeding tickets.

What about the fact that speed limits used to be upwards of 85 mph but today we’re driving around in safer cars with crash bodies, air bags, seat belts, and more at speeds of only 65 mph. Doesn’t make sense? You’re right.

The speed limit people have nothing to stand on. They are just after our money. So break the law and get away with whatever you can as long as it’s safe in your opinion to do so.

2 Responses to “The Hypocrisy of the Speed Limit”

  1. displace says:

    Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve visited this website before but after going through
    a few of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Regardless,
    I’m definitely happy I discovered it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back often!

  2. Concerned driver says:

    Jordan, I can not wait for you to go back to the East Coast as well. It is drivers like you that California does not need.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  • Latest Video

  • Twitter

    • Twitter loading...
  • Popular Posts

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • Vic on:
      "Quite often you see people that will turn right in front of you cutting you off when you are going some insane speed." The problem is your driving at an insane speed. It's insane aa you say.
    • Vic on:
      Who the hell do you think you are thinking like you own the road driving dangerously fast, putting lives in jeopardy? Slower, law abiding drivers also have a right to get in the fast lane if they need to switch freeways. I hope they install cameras to get all these potential murderers.
    • parker on:
      Asian Drivers
      same as american ladies. they drives suck
    • shane on:
      Don't piss off the truckers
      I have lived in cali for about 5 years now, originally from the mid west. one thing I notice is truck drivers are complete asshloes here. they always drive in the far right lane, don't even slow down to let cars merge. they act like they're driving minis and not an 18 ton car crusher.complete disregard for safty and totally unprofessional. maybe we need another way to ship goods!!!
    • Shijian zhang on:
      Hey, bro. I think you might be one of those bad driver! Many people said most left lab is a express lane! Who tol you that? Is there any different limit speed for different lane on the free way? Limit speed for any of the lanes on the free way! Of course I agree that slower traffics are better to stay in the most right lane but it is doesn't mean that you can go over speeding in the most left lane on the free way! I am a California driving instructor and owner. I believe that you need to learn driving again!
    • Dur on:
      California drivers 80% are stupid drivers,they are reckless, careless drivers and bad attitude.
    • Kendrix on:
      I agree and I have lived in California for the last 3 years. And yes, thus is the worst state i have yet to see in the US. There's so many people that drive here with no licenses and no insurance. And people who need to really go through drivers ed. My husband was rear ended on Highway I5 by a van with an illegal driver, my husband pulled over so did they but once my husband got out of the car they sped away. We got the license plate called the cops and they were able to track them down, but they used the excuse that the owner did not drive that day and that he did not know who drove his van that day. Our insurance took care of everything after finding out that the driver was indeed illegal, have no license. Again this morning this guy (if you can call him that, cut me off from a non passing lane and proceeded to slam on his break causing me to almost rear end him. And the jerk had the audacity to flick me off and cuss me out! He even went as far as telling me to get out of my car and Duke it out! What? So I did, I opened my door and guess what? The idiot ran a red light just to get away! Haha haha! Guess he was afraid of getting a beat down from a female! Which I'm glad it did not go that far as he's not worth going yo jail for! So, whoever you are black mini Cooper license plate 6XYK224, calm down, lay off the steroids and take anger management class along with driver's ed to learn how to drive properly!
    • Cliff Thompson on:
      LA drivers truly suck. I have been around the world and most of the other states. This is I notice for LA: 1) pass at the right drive slow on the left. 2) Weave in and out of lanes. This causes traffic for no reason. 3) ride ass. This also cause traffic for nothing. 4) drive too fast or too slow. Drive the speed of traffic. 5) not allow merging. The merger needs to drive the speed of traffic. The existing just needs to drive the same speed and make slight adjustments. 6) stupid lights. What is this blinking green left turnin the middle of rush hour. Do this at night. 7) stop driving like assholes. In most places thugs drive this way.
    • Name on:
      In Cali slow drivers cut off fast drivers, the exiting lane is now the passing lane to the point where they go on the exiting island. Not saying it happened once or twice. No, you'll watch 5 cars do it in 15 min. Everyone's on there phone. I almost get hit 3 times a day. And I just commute around my own city. It doesn't help that new drivers are given bmw's ether. They should have a license retake test every 4 years or so to get rid of some crazy drivers.
    • Dahlia on:
      Watch These Army Humvees Violently Crash Into The Ground After A Failed Airdrop
      I've lived in CA all my life. In 1987, the traffic in Orange County was gettin horrendous. In '91, I moved to San Diego and it was so much better. But, that was a long time ago. The County/City allows excessive growth, we have illegals driving here uninsured and with dangerous driving habits, and now a larger influx who drive here legally. It feels like I'm playing bumper cars at a Fair, going 70 mph! Not to mention the texters, cell phone users, tailgaters, weavers, and slow pokes. Seriously. If you are driving 45-60, stay in the SLOW lane. If 75-80, stay in the FAST lane. People forget there are consequences to driving like fools. Vehicular Manslaughter for one..PRISON. Maiming a person. Losing your license. Citations, which are one wks wages, here in CA. If you missed your exit, don't cut off 3 lanes of traffic! Get off at the NEXT exit and circle around! These things are such basics. And if CA DMV continues to hand out licenses like candy to uninsured, incompetent drivers, they are due a massive lawsuit! Gov and Employees! I think if SD continues to add more businesses and housing in already congested areas, they are due a massive lawsuit as well! One time it took me 45 minutes to drive 3 miles! And they're adding MORE business buildings to that area!? So, why do I stay? FAMILY. I appreciate that we have various cultures here, lots to do, decent weather, but we do have a lot of people here who are clueless about personal space! Some people are snooty, have a sense of entitlement and some are just plain ol' mean and act like elitists. There are pervs all throughout our neighborhoods, sex offenders. Yeah, that gives me a GREAT sense of security. And people are messed up with addictions of all sorts. THIS is what Boxer, Feinstein, Brown and the Liberals have done to this beautiful state. Not to mention introducing sex ed at Kindergarten on up. Which has led to sexual harassment in the schools...."boys" pressuring their classmates to sleep with them. What a travesty! Now Obama wants to allow males in all Girls and Women's Restrooms?!? Do you not see the MADNESS of this political party? "Bad is good; good is bad." Forcing Nuns to cover insurance which covers abortion??? When he said Americans would not be forced to pay for abortions. This nation was founded with the Declaration of Independence, "Rights to...LIFE, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness..." We protect unhatched Eagle's Eggs. They have more rights than Humans, by Hillary's estimation! Children born here by illegal parents are given Constitutional rights as US citizens, even before birth. The illegal mother gets free medical assistance, as well as the unborn and newborn child. It's a farce. Hillary is just trying to buy votes....or she has lost her soul. Don't you see, as we elect godless leaders, who have no conscience, we ALL suffer the consequences. Are you paying more taxes? More out of pocket for medical care and insurance? I AM. $3000 per yr out of pocket, plus premiums. "You will not pay one more dime when Obamcare goes through." LIE. Honesty, integrity, value for Life, protecting those who are WEAK, who have no voice, treating others as YOU would like to be treated. Would you have wanted to be murdered in the womb? Torn apart in a painful abortion, so your cells could be used in experiments (btw, which so far has not yielded one cure)? Vote your CONSCIENCE. Vote with the values instilled in your soul. Drop any candidate who is self seeking, miopic, blind to the state of the nation, perverting our land. Drop any candidate who is an iron fisted bully or a spineless blob. 1 chance, the you're out! If they fail to live up to their promises. Recall them. Impeach them. Stop the senseless spending.

  • About

    I’ve driven in California since 1991. I’ve spent many trips running up and down the state as well as driving in many other states. After all of this driving, I became fed up with how bad California drivers on. I wanted to point out what they do to either help change a few drivers or at least entertain the rest of the world with Californian’s horrible driving.

    I’m located in Orange County in a couple of the richest areas. I see every type of car that is out there in this area. It’s like a car show. Going to a car show isn’t exciting anymore because you see most of the cars driving around anyway. I also work at a place where people buy all the different types of cars. We have Lamborghinis, Ferraris, Lotus, etc. So you can even see a lot of the cars in the work parking lot.

    Disclaimer: You’re on your own with these tips. They are not the official law and in no way represent what you should be doing should a cop pull you over.

  • Meta